The Influence of Work-Life Balance and Job Satisfaction on Turnover Intention Among Generation Z Employees at Four Points by Sheraton Jakarta, Thamrin

Authors

  • Renu Fara Dea
  • Youmil Abrian Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63076/jomm.v2i3.56

Keywords:

Work-Life Balance, Job Satisfaction, Turnover Intention, Generation Z, Hospitality Industry, Employee Retention

Abstract

The hospitality industry plays a crucial role in tourism competitiveness, yet high turnover intention, particularly among Generation Z employees, remains a major challenge that threatens operational stability and increases recruitment costs. This study investigates the effect of work-life balance and job satisfaction on turnover intention among Generation Z employees at Four Points by Sheraton Jakarta, Thamrin. Using a quantitative design, data were collected from 43 respondents through structured questionnaires and analyzed with SPSS 25.0 using validity and reliability testing, classical assumption testing, and multiple linear regression. The findings show that work-life balance (β = –0.586, p < 0.001) and job satisfaction (β = –0.518, p < 0.001) both have significant negative effects on turnover intention. The model explains 81.6% of the variance (Adjusted R² = 0.816), highlighting that enhancing work-life balance and job satisfaction can substantially reduce turnover intention. These results provide theoretical contributions to employee retention studies and practical implications for human resource strategies in the hospitality industry.

References

P. E. Ngo-Henha, “A Review of Existing Turnover Intention Theories,” Int. J. Bus. Manage., vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1–10, 2017, doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v12n11p141.

I. Yücel, “The Mediating Effect of Turnover Intention on the Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Actual Turnover,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 124, pp. 335–342, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.033.

A. Alrawahi, “Job satisfaction as a mediator between transformational leadership and employee performance: Evidence from a developing country,” Manage. Sci. Lett., vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 3855–3864, 2020, doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2020.7.010.

T. T. Oamen, “The nexus of perceived organisational support, job satisfaction, and motivation on turnover intentions of sales executives using structural equation modeling,” Int. J. Bus. Manage. Invention, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1–10, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ijbmi.org/papers/Vol(10)11/Ser-1/A10110110.pdf

N. S. Apriani, “Factors Affecting Turnover Intention: A Literature Review,” Int. J. Bus. Technol. Behav., pp. 224–231, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ijbtob.org/index.php/ijbtob/article/view/41

S. Blumberga and A. Hasan, “Work-Life Balance: Aspirations of Career and Personal Life,” ResearchGate preprint, 2022, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16971.92965.

L. Qi, J. Liu, and H. She, “Indicators of Work-Life Balance: Flexible Work, Time Management, and Organizational Support,” ResearchGate preprint, 2024, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26273.56165.

R. E. Sari, “Work-Life Balance, Stress, and Job Satisfaction: Exploring Their Effect on Turnover Intention,” Equilibrium J. Econ. Manage. Account., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 123–135, 2021, doi: 10.25105/equilibrium.v19i2.10191.

M. Ekhsan, “Effect of Job Embeddedness, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment on Employee Turnover Intention,” J. Bus. Manage. Account., pp. 48–55, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://journal.stieama.ac.id/index.php/jbma/article/view/207

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), “Hospitality Industry Employment Statistics,” BPS Indonesia, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id

N. N. Lestari, “The Effect of Job Stress, Organizational Commitment, and Job Satisfaction on Turnover Intention,” E-J. Manage., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 3412–3441, 2021, doi: 10.24843/EJMUNUD.2021.v07.i06.p14.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-19

How to Cite

Renu Fara Dea, & Youmil Abrian. (2025). The Influence of Work-Life Balance and Job Satisfaction on Turnover Intention Among Generation Z Employees at Four Points by Sheraton Jakarta, Thamrin. Journal of Multidimensional Management, 2(3), 278–283. https://doi.org/10.63076/jomm.v2i3.56